Logged out
Access All our Essays in an Instant
Swap your work for FREE access, or pay £4.99 for instant access
Which is the more important attribute of the historian: the ability to analyse evidence scientifically, or the ability to develop interpretations of evidence using creative imagination?
Member rating:
(1 vote)
| Words:
| Submitted: Thu Jan 13 2005
On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:
Cristina Valencia 12th grade Theory of Knowledge Murray Thomas Which is the more important attribute of the historian: the ability to analyse evidence scientifically, or the ability to develop interpretations of evidence using creative imagination? The main aim of a historian is to issue knowledge and information from the past. The word history is portrayed as a recollection of evidence from ancient times. This evidence has helped people to deduce and build up ethical historic events that took place centuries ago. Nevertheless, the analysis of evidence and knowledge a historian undergoes is extremely subjective, and its significance is of great importance. The information conveyed in this historic knowledge can be used by other people to interpret facts from the past. Here, we can see a clear contrast between the History Area of Knowledge and the Art-Science Area of Knowledge. The desire to publish conclusions of the historical evidence is something that all...
To see the full version of this document, and 145,328 others
