Your Status: Logged out Log in

Pret interpretâciju.  

Member rating: No Rating | Words: | Submitted: Mon Jan 26 2004

Page Preview
Preview
Previous 1 of 18 Next

On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:

Sjuzena Zontaga Pret interpretaciju eseja 1964 Butiba ir atspulgs no kaut ka, negaidita sastapšanas, kas lidziga uzliesmojumam. Ta ir loti smalcina, loti smalcina - butiba. VILEMS DE KENINGS (no intervijas) Tikai vieglpratigi cilveki neverte pec arienes. Pasaules misterija ir redzamais, nevis neredzamais. OSKARS VAILDS (vestule) 1 Jadoma, ka makslas sakotneja pieredze bus bijusi vardošanas, magiska pieredze; maksla bija rituala piederums. (Sal. alu zimejumus Lasko, Altamira, Nijo, Lapasjega u.c.) Senaka makslas teorija, kas mantota no sengrieku filozofiem, vestija, ka maksla ir mimeze, realitates atdarinašana. šaja sakariba radies specifiskais jautajums par makslas vertibu. Jau pati mimezes teorijas terminologija liek makslai uzsakt sevis attaisnošanu. Platons, kas izveidojis šo teoriju, to darijis, škiet, tapec, lai pavestitu, ka makslas vertiba ir apšaubama. Ta ka, vinaprat, pašas materialas lietas ir mimetiski objekti, transcendentu formu vai strukturu imitacijas, pat vislabakais gultas gleznojums izradas tikai "atdarinajuma atdarinajums". Pec Platona domam, maksla nav nedz ipaši deriga (gultas gleznojums neder gulešanai), nedz, stingri vertejot, patiesa....

Get instant access



  • Instant, unlimited access to our documents in full
  • Swap your work for free access, or pay £4.99
  • To see the full version of this document and 147,383 others
Register Now
OR

Receive email updates for this category



  • Simply tell us your email address and receive a weekly Study Help Email for FREE
  • Receive 3 FREE essay views with each email
  • Get all the latest essays from Coursework.Info & discussion from TheStudentRoom.co.uk