Your Status: Logged out Log in

"Does housing in general, and home ownership in particular, comprise anything more than just a class-related distributive outcome?"  

Member rating: No Rating | Words: | Submitted: Wed Oct 22 2003

Page Preview
Preview
Previous 1 of 7 Next

On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:

DISCUSS THE CONTENTION THAT HOUSING TENURE IS NOW LESS IMPORTANT FOR DISTINGUISHING BETWEEN SOCIAL CLASSES THAN IN THE 1950S "Does housing in general, and home ownership in particular, comprise anything more than just a class-related distributive outcome?" (Hamnett 1995:257) Hamnett posed this question in 1995 in his paper 'Home Ownership and the Middle Classes'. He went on to investigate possible answers in much the same way as I intend to discuss the contention that housing tenure is now less important for distinguishing between social classes than in the 1950s. Housing has always been of interest to geographers and sociologists alike, in their quest to determine social stratification and in their investigation into the various relationships between society and space. Indeed in the 1950s social theorists and policy analysts were mainly concerned with the reconstruction and repair of the post war society and the housing issues relating to that, in particular a desperate...

To see the full version of this document, and 143,615 others

Register Now