Your Status: Logged out Log in

Disucss the conention that weak leadership, rather than any economic or political factor was the main reason for the failure of Chartism?  

Member rating: No Rating | Words: | Submitted: Fri Mar 09 2007

Page Preview
Preview
Previous 1 of 13 Next

On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:

To what extent was weak leadership rather than any political or economic factors, the main reason for the failure of Chartism? By Samuel Nurding Candidate Number: 0175 Centre Number: 65217 Word count: How close did Britain come to having a major working class movement cause a full-scale political revolution in mid-Victorian England? It's an intriguing question, and historians still argue the point. It is questionable that Chartism was doomed to fail from the beginning; nonetheless, weak leadership has been blamed by many historians as a vital cause for the disintegration of the Chartist movement in 1841, but to what extent is this true? Chartism was a movement established and to an extent controlled by working men in 1836 to achieve parliamentary democracy as a step towards social and economic reform. Probably the best way to interpret the implications of the movement is to appreciate that it emerged towards the end of a...

To see the full version of this document, and 144,847 others

Register Now