Your Status: Logged out Log in

How Russia’s Institutional Structure has affected its Prospects for Democratization.  

Member rating: 10 out of 10 stars (1 vote) | Words: | Submitted: Thu Jul 11 2002

Page Preview
Preview
Previous 1 of 25 Next

On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:

How Russia's Institutional Structure has affected its Prospects for Democratization. As Scott Mainwaring has said, "choices of political institutions matter."1 Determining, however, in what way they matter is a decidedly difficult task. The purpose of this paper is to attempt to show how choices of institutional structure in Russia's democratic transition have affected its prospects for democratization. More specifically, I will argue that, contrary to much of the literature of the Western political elite, the choice of semi-presidentialism over a parliamentary system was the better choice. I do not intend to prove that presidentialism is superior to parliamentarism in general because, frankly, I don't believe that to be true and, more importantly, I don't think that it is necessary to my argument. All I seek to prove is that some aspects of presidentialism have done more to further Russia's chances of democratic consolidation than a parliamentary system would have. Underlying my...

To see the full version of this document, and 145,348 others

Register Now