"I have a group of GCSE English students who absolutely rave over your site and constantly tell me how useful they have found it to be. Trust me it has inspired them."
Beyond Pythagoras.
- Words:
- 3145
- Submitted:
- Mon Jun 28 2004

... Beyond Pythagoras The numbers 3, 4 and 5 satisfy the condition 32+42=52, Because 32= 3x3 =9 42= 4x4 =16 52= 5x5 =25 And so... 32+42=9+16=25=52 I now have to find out if the following sets of numbers satisfy a similar condition of (smallest number) 2+ (middle number) 2= (largest number) 2. a) 5, 12, 13 52+122 = 25+144 = 169 = 132. b) 7, 24, 25 72+242 = 49+576 = 625 +252 Here is a table containing the results: I looked at the table and noticed that there was only a difference of 1 between the length of the middle side and the length of the longest side. I already know that the (smallest number) 2+ (middle number) 2= (largest number) 2. So I know that there will be a connection between the numbers written above. The problem is that it is obviously not: (Middle number) 2+ (largest number) 2= (smallest number) 2 Because, 122 + 132 = 144+169 = 313 52 = 25 The difference between














