Your Status: Logged out Log in

Tort Project 2003  

Member rating: No Rating | Words: | Submitted: Wed Jun 08 2005

Page Preview
Preview
Previous 1 of 10 Next

On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:

NAME: Vivienne Matthews O'Neill STUDENT NUMBER: 00394556 LECTURER: Ms Kathleen Moore-Walsh TITLE: The concept of transferred malice is not accepted in Irish tort law, why not? WORD COUNT: DATE DUE: 5th December 2003 10 Contents 1. Introduction 2. Main theory>what is a battery>what is transferred malice>transferred malice in crime>Livingstone v Ministry of Defence>other jurisdictions opinion 3. Conclusion 4. Bibliography 10 Introduction The title of this assignment, which i propose that i shall be revisiting for the purposes of this tort project is that: "the concept of transferred malice is not accepted in Irish tort law" In dealing with this topic I will inevitably be looking at what a battery is, what is transferred malice, cases in other jurisdictions which have accepted the concept of transferred malice in tort law, transferred malice in crime and why it is accepted in criminal law, and finally my arguments as to why I believe it should be adopted into our jurisdiction. In examining this topic it will be necessary...

To see the full version of this document, and 145,348 others

Register Now