Logged out
Access All our Essays in an Instant
Swap your work for FREE access, or pay £4.99 for instant access
Legally the brothers could now be a partnership emphasised by Jessel MR in Pooley v Driver [1876] that a labour contribution may be enough to found a partnership.
Member rating: No Rating | Words: | Submitted: Mon Dec 22 2003
Page Preview
On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:
MG 2080A Company Law A) While Stan Wicks worked on his own as jobbing builder he would have been classed as a sole trader. As the business grew in size he took his brother on. Legally the brothers could now be a partnership emphasised by Jessel MR in Pooley v Driver [1876] that a labour contribution may be enough to found a partnership. Classed as "The relationship, which subsists between persons carrying on in business in common with a view to profit", sec 1 Partnership Act 1890. The Act defines a partnership as 'a relationship' that is to say its not a legal person in its own right. A firms name is merely an alias for its members jointly, so any contract entered into in the name of the firm would be with the partners jointly. The rules of the Supreme Court allow firms to sue and be sued in the...
Get instant access
- Instant, unlimited access to our documents in full
- Swap your work for free access, or pay £4.99
- To see the full version of this document and 146,209 others
Receive email updates for this category
- Simply tell us your email address and receive a weekly Study Help Email for FREE
- Receive 3 FREE essay views with each email
- Get all the latest essays from Coursework.Info & discussion from TheStudentRoom.co.uk
