ANALYSIS
Member rating: No Rating | Words: | Submitted: Wed Oct 18 2006
On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:
ANALYSIS RESULTS CONDITION 1 - LIGHT/DARK No. of Woodlice Experiment Light Dark 1 3 7 2 2 8 3 3 7 4 2 8 5 4 6 6 1 9 7 3 7 8 4 6 9 2 8 10 3 7 Total 27 73 CONDITION 2 - DAMP/DRY No. of Woodlice Experiment Dry Damp 1 1 9 2 2 8 3 2 8 4 1 9 5 2 8 6 3 7 7 1 9 8 0 10 9 2 8 10 1 9 Total 15 85 CONDITION 3 - DAMP & DARK/DRY & LIGHT No. of Woodlice Experiment Light & Dry Dark & Damp 1 1 9 2 2 8 3 1 9 4 3 7 5 1 9 6 4 6 7 2 8 8 3 7 9 3 7 10 1 9 Total 21 79 NULL HYPOTHESIS CONDITION 1 Dark and light conditions will have no significant effect on the behaviour of the woodlice. CONDITION 2 Dry and humid conditions will have no significant effect on the behaviour of the woodlice. CONDITION 3 Dry/Light and Damp/Dark conditions will have no significant effect on the behaviour of the woodlice. DEGREES OF FREEDOM Degrees of Freedom = No of Categories - 1 2 Categories in each of the three experiments Therefore 2 - 1 = 1 The critical value of ?2 = 3.84 ?2CRIT = 3.84 At the 5% probability level the calculated values ?2 for each of the experiments are: - Dark/Light - 21.16 Dry/Damp - 49 Light & Dark/Dry & Damp - 33.64 All these values ?2 are greater than the critical value, we therefore reject the null hypothesis and say there is no significant difference between the...

