"The arts deal in the particular, the individual and the personal while the sciences deal in the general, the universal and the collective." To what extent does this statement obscure both Areas of Knowledge?
Member rating: No Rating | Words: | Submitted: Wed Oct 29 2003
On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:
Linda Lapina TOK final essay Word count: 1584 "The arts deal in the particular, the individual and the personal while the sciences deal in the general, the universal and the collective." To what extent does this statement obscure both Areas of Knowledge? Areas of Knowledge are the expedients possessed by individuals to form new knowledge. The given claim implies that arts can only be useful in obtaining personal knowledge, while sciences help us form universal knowledge that can be shared between all individuals. The given statement regards arts as only actual to an individual, while referring to sciences as something entirely universal. And we cannot deny that science basically makes generalizations from getting to know the particular, while the most powerful works of art make an emphasis on specific in order to influence individual observers. Besides, there is a vital difference between scientific and artistic knowledge. There is much smaller possibility to raise empathy...

