Logged out
Access All our Essays in an Instant
Swap your work for FREE access, or pay £4.99 for instant access
Is the photograph (Source 15) likely to be a more reliable source of evidence about life on the canals than the painting (source16)?
Member rating: No Rating | Words: | Submitted: Wed Oct 20 2004
Page Preview
On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:
Andrew Jefferson Coursework IS THE PHOTOGRAPH (SOURCE15) LIKELY TO BE A MORE RELIABLE SOURCE OF EVIDENCE ABOUT LIFE ON THE CANALS THAN THE PAINTING (SOURCE16)? In my opinion the photograph (source 15) is a more reliable source about life on the canals more than the painting (source 16). In this essay I will write about why I think source 15 is a more reliable source of evidence than source 16. The painting is a snap-shot (taken at the time) and therefore is a primary source. Source 16 is a secondary source of evidence. On the one hand source 15 has limited information, but on the other hand the information it contains can be used and inferred to see how reliable the source actually is. The first thing I noticed in the photograph was the people. I would expect a family to be working on a barge because families needed the money and the companies needed...
To see the full version of this document, and 145,348 others
