Evaluate Korsgaard's discussion of the Universalizability Argument. In what ways does she conform with Kant and in what ways does she deviate? Do you think her argument is successful?
- Words:
- 4281
- Submitted:
- Mon Nov 01 2004

Have a little read: ... Contemporary Ethical Theory Alvin Aguilar Sario May 14, 2004 Evaluate Korsgaard's discussion of the Universalizability Argument. In what ways does she conform with Kant and in what ways does she deviate? Do you think her argument is successful? Christine Korsgaard argued for the universalizability of moral principles based on the notion of autonomy and categorical imperative as employed by Kant. He further argued that autonomy is the source of obligation and moral identity dictates moral obligations. He first assumed that morality is grounded in human nature. He arrived at this through a critique of voluntarism, realism, and reflective endorsement. Korsgaard is largely Kantian in this respect as she extrapolates on the sources of normativity. Affirming the significance of reflective endorsement vis-à-vis to endorse a desire based on reason or to reject it and get obligation, she focuses on the crucial role and relations of human identity (moral identity/practical identity), human will (categorical imperative), and
BETTER MARKS THAN I EVER HOPED FOR
A FANTASTIC HELP
Secure low cost access to the largest collection of model answers anywhere...
Finally, did you know, we are the only essay site certified as safe by the Credit Card industry? (100% PCI DSS compliant). You can feel 100% secure accessing the largest collection of model answers on the Internet - plus our very low price means even struggling students can afford to get help fast. Start now...
- Feel secure and in control - the ultimate stress buster
- We're the only site with over 1 Million monthly visitors
- You'll instantly spot winning structures and ideas - FAST!
- Backed by Anti-plagiarism experts
- Your revision, essays or coursework DONE! Just 17p!










