Were Milgram and Zimbardo unethical?
Member rating: No Rating | Words: | Submitted: Fri Jan 09 2004
On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:
Ethical Issues Were Milgram and Zimbardo unethical? There is no doubt that both Milgram and Zimbardo caused great distress to volunteers in their studies of obedience and conformity to social roles. The two studies show us, very dramatically, the power of the situation on human behaviour. Milgram and Zimbardo chose ordinary people, of a sound psychological profile, not sadists and put them into challenging situations. In spite of their distress, or that of others, many volunteers continued in their violent behaviour. Volunteers were deceived and offered money to take part, In itself this is not unusual, deception of some sort is a feature of almost all psychological experiments, and small payments encourage people to take part. It may be argued that the volunteers were not reminded of their right to withdraw from the experiments at any time, in fact, they were encouraged to keep going, in order to see what happened. It is important to...

