Your Status: Logged out Log in

For some people science is the supreme form of all knowledge. Is this view reasonable or does it involve a misunderstanding of science or of knowledge?  

Member rating: No Rating | Words: | Submitted: Sat Oct 23 2004

Page Preview
Preview
Previous 1 of 4 Next

On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:

THEORY OF KNOWLEDGE Question 1 For some people science is the supreme form of all knowledge. Is this view reasonable or does it involve a misunderstanding of science or of knowledge? Name: Michaela Villinova Word count: 1375 words Some people regard science as the supreme form of knowledge, because science provides facts. People tend to see science as true, justified, reliable, precise and objective. However there is a significant difference between natural and social sciences. Natural sciences use 'the basic scientific method' to find the facts about the world we live in, the natural events and processes that take place in our world. The 'basic scientific method' or naïve inductivism follows five stages which include observation, information, generalization, theory and explanation and prediction. However though the basic scientific method seems perfectly reliable, there may be some problems which could challenge science as the supreme form of knowledge. Social sciences study human behaviour, relationships and...

To see the full version of this document, and 144,846 others

Register Now