Your Status: Logged out Log in

To what extent had psychological research shown Eye Witness Testimony to be reliable and accurate?

Member rating: 8 out of 10 stars (1 vote) | Words: 854 | Submitted: Tue Mar 11 2008

Page Preview
Preview
Previous 1 of 1 Next

On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:

To what extent had psychological research shown Eye Witness Testimony to be reliable and accurate? There are many cases that both help and hinder the reliability and accuracy of EWT (Eye Witness Testimony). One experiment conducted by Loftus and Palmer showed strong results of unreliability and inaccuracy. They gathered a group of American students and showed them a video of a car accident. They then asked them several questions including "At what speed do you think the cars were going when they (hit/smashed/collided/bumped/contacted) each other?" Only one verb was used per participant. Loftus found that the estimated speed changed depending on the verb they used. The verb affected part of the participants' memory of the incident. This is strong evidence to show that EWT is highly unreliable as it can be affected by leading questions such as that of Loftus and Palmer's. But this theory can be criticised by the idea...

To see the full version of this document, and 143,651 others

Register Now