AS and A Level: Politics: United States Coursework

"The writer shows decent knowledge of the differences between the UK system and the US system, highlighting the checks on power and the split loyalties of congressmen in the US. The essay is badly let down, though, by a clumsy writing style, evidenced by poor punctuation and grammar. Some sentences have no verb, and others are badly structured. The writer would do well to ask someone to check for these things in future. The format of the conclusion, I feel, is not suitable for an essay. Sadly, these things detract significantly from the content, which is quite impressive. TSR user: Edenr."

"A decent essay that goes through the various presidencies of the late 20th century, outlining the attitude of each towards federal government. In terms of providing information, the essay does that well, but it reads a little on the dull side. It would be nice if the writer injected more of his/her own opinion on the matter, to break up the paragraphs of factual content. One major criticism I would have of the essay is the lack of focus on the Constitution and the respect (or lack of) shown by the various governments towards it. TSR user: Edenr."

"A well-written essay. The writer considers both the pros and cons of allowing influence groups and lobbyists to mix with politicians, and comes to a well-thought out conclusion. A knowledge of the more well-known interest groups is shown, as is knowledge of their past involvements in the democratic process, successful or otherwise. An important point that the writer makes is that pressure groups are often speaking on behalf of those who have no voice themselves. These groups are often portrayed as in the pocket of big business, or purely self-interested, but that is not the case. Although I disagree with the final conclusion, I approve of the essay. TSR user: Edenr."

"Very good Essay, Nice brief synopsis of each cabinet position. Concise, too the point and no BS"

"A very well-written essay. The writer picks up on the key differences between judiciary systems in the UK and the US, and explores the restrictions these place on the decisions courts can make. Historical and legal knowledge is evident, and really gives the essay's conclusions significant credence. The writer does not forget to mention the slightly obvious differences between judges and politicians, re the way they are chosen and the responsibilities their roles carry. Spelling, punctuation and grammar are fine. A very enjoyable read. TSR user: Edenr."