Logged out
Access All our Essays in an Instant
Swap your work for FREE access, or pay £4.99 for instant access
How are distinctions made between factual reporting, interpretation and distortion ?
Member rating: No Rating | Words: | Submitted: Thu Aug 14 2003
Page Preview
On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:
How are distinctions made between factual reporting, interpretation and distortion ? Society's interpretation of factual reporting on newspapers, magazines, slogans, commercials, speeches and everyday-life conversations can be very different from the actual meaning. This is why interpretation is described to be the particular way in which something is understood or explained. Depending on the purpose of the given messages, the factual reporting can sometimes be distorted , so as to change the truth of the subject. Therefore, the meaning of distortion is a change of facts or ideas so they are no longer correct or true. Factual reporting can be objective, neutral or subjective. Nowadays, these three terms are put into practice very frequently in the different areas of knowledge, such as media, ethics, arts... When the facts are not changed in any way and the outcome reflects the truth and real value of the story, then it is considered...
To see the full version of this document, and 145,348 others
