There are certain benefits to having appointed members in the House ofLords. If the members were elected a great deal of money would be spent onelections and campaigning. This money could be better spent on other importantissues. Elections are also ...
Member rating: No Rating | Words: | Submitted: Thu Oct 16 2003
On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:
There are certain benefits to having appointed members in the House of Lords. If the members were elected a great deal of money would be spent on elections and campaigning. This money could be better spent on other important issues. Elections are also very time consuming, this is why having an appointed member system is often much simpler and easier in the short term. Another benefit of having appointed members is that pressure groups are more likely to be let in to an appointed chamber, as they may be needed if they have special expertise in a certain area. They are also likely to be put in so the House of Lords has a good image, that it is more democratic and representative of a wider variety of views and opinions. The reason behind having appointed members is that people who are deserving should be placed in the House of...


