Your Status: Logged out Log in

A Comparison of Methods for History Matching.  

Member rating: No Rating | Words: | Submitted: Wed Feb 25 2004

Page Preview
Preview
Previous 1 of 6 Next

On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:

A Comparison of Methods for History Matching All methods mentioned in this literature, have all used 3Dimensional Streamline and its simulator for simulation purposes. The underlying method is assigning parameters or function to the streamlines to match its flow and predict its future advancements. Also, all the methods are able to match the historical rates quite wells with certain limitations. These limitations allow for further developments and new techniques to be introduced to history matching. To start off, traditional history matching method involves simulation and identification of the difference between the simulated and observed performance, determination of the grid block in the model that requires change, designation of properties that need change and what those changes are, implementation of those changes and finally iterating these steps until a satisfactory result is achieved. This method, although it is quite tedious and requires ad hoc decision making, isn't completely left out from the...

To see the full version of this document, and 144,904 others

Register Now