Your Status: Logged out Log in

“In a just society criminal liability should never be imposed without some degree of blameworthiness”  

Member rating: No Rating | Words: | Submitted: Fri Nov 18 2005

Page Preview
Preview
Previous 1 of 2 Next

On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:

"In a just society criminal liability should never be imposed without some degree of blameworthiness" Offences of strict liability are those, which do not require any mens rea with regards to at least one or more of the actus rea. The mens rea usually requires intention and or recklessness. However some crimes are possible to commit without any knowledge, intention or responsibility on behalf of the defendant. Therefore the primary issue is should these defendants be guilty and held liable for these crimes under strict liability. In Gammon (Hong Kong) ltd v Attorney General (Hong Kong) 1984, the grounds on which strict liability can be imposed were brought about; As a general rule, the more serious the criminal offence created by statute, the less likely the courts are to view it as an offence of strict liability. For acts, which are truly criminal mens rea should be needed in order to make the defendant...

Get instant access



  • Instant, unlimited access to our documents in full
  • Swap your work for free access, or pay £4.99
  • To see the full version of this document and 147,038 others
Register Now
OR

Receive email updates for this category



  • Simply tell us your email address and receive a weekly Study Help Email for FREE
  • Receive 3 FREE essay views with each email
  • Get all the latest essays from Coursework.Info & discussion from TheStudentRoom.co.uk