Advise the parties of their criminal liability. What difference, if any would make the answer if J had died.
Member rating: No Rating | Words: | Submitted: Mon Jun 06 2005
On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:
CRIMINAL LAW SUGGESTED ANSWER J and K went into a jeweller's shop in order to have their ear pierced. The sixteen year old assistant, L employed by M, the owner of the shop, failed to sterilize the needle before J's ear and between piercing and was seriously ill for three months. Subsequently, k, after a blood test, was found to have become HIV positive. J had known that she, J was HIV positive hen she went into the shop. Advise the parties of their criminal liability. What difference, if any would make the answer if J had died. SUGGESTED ANSWER : The issues here are: 1. L's liability for piercing J's ears resulting in illness. OAPA S 18, 20, 47, 23 & 24. 2. L's liability for piercing K's ears and passing the HIV. OAPA S 18, 20, 47, 23 & 24. 3. L's liability if J died Homicide: manslaughter 4. M's liability for any of the above...

