Dodgy developers are looking to claim compensation from office suppliers for delivering there workstations later than contracted, which in turn resulted in dodgy developers refurbishment being late and thereby they suffered loss.
Member rating: No Rating | Words: | Submitted: Mon Jan 16 2006
On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:
Dodgy developers are looking to claim compensation from office suppliers for delivering there workstations later than contracted, which in turn resulted in dodgy developers refurbishment being late and thereby they suffered loss. Dodgy developers had a contract with office supplies, which stated that office supplies would deliver the workstations on Monday the 28th of November. The contract was made over the phone and it can be assumed that this contract was binding. After this contract was made office supplies sent out there terms and conditions. On trying to seek damages from office supplies for the workstations being late resulting in loss, office supplies referred dodgy dealers to their terms and conditions one of which stated that they would not be liable for any losses or damage however caused. However these terms can be considered void as dodgy developers received them after the initial contract was made. In the text it says...


