AS and A Level: English Literature: Prose: Pre-1900 Coursework

"A very good piece of coursework. It is excellent to see that you have developed some skills and now have a better understanding of being an active citizen. You have outlined the main areas which are needed in your citizenship coursework - such as, what you did, how you did it, what did not go well and how could you improve. I have no doubt that this would achieve a very high grade. Proof-read your work after you have finished, as I have found a couple of spelling errors. TSR User: boosh_slayer"

"A very pleasing essay! A pleasure to read. The structure of the essay is sound and clear, the argument evolves naturally and your logic is clear and backed up with a decent amount of evidence - I think, perhaps, that you may actually run the risk of having not enough quotes at points - while your vocabulary is evidently well stocked and well utilised. I must say, however, perhaps the introduction isn't as focused as I would like - it took two careful readings to fully grasp what was going on. However, I must confess that I'm searching for these faults because it is a sublime essay. TSR User: chidona"

"This essay is not brilliant, it lacks quotes and the explanations given could be in more depth. It's a tad disorganised and the conclusion doesn't really conclude much. The grammar isn't all that either. However, it raises some good points that I hadn't considered before. 3/5"

"This essay, although written in a very simplistic way, does make some interesting and original analysis of some of the opening chapter's points. Not all of what the author brought up was capitalised on: some select quotations gave a good impression that he knew what he was talking about, but the real killer points weren't communicated. Also, stylistically, the essay is a real disappointment. It is essentially, a director's commentary of the book. Clearly, the writing process involved writing the essay, and adding to the end of the essay when he read an interesting point. This doesn't affect some often good content, but makes a disappointed and stilted read. TSR User:DavyS"

"An excellent essay. The writing style is fluid and weaves between the two texts: and more! Comparing the two texts with Milton's choice of words is an inspired choice. There is enough in the essay about both the big picture of the characters and themes, as well as working more in depth, often swapping between the two in the same sentence. The comparisons are also interesting to read, and go beyond the mere simplistic arguments that would've been all to easy in a comparison of this manner. Very good read. TSR User:DavyS"