Logged out
Access All our Essays in an Instant
Swap your work for FREE access, or pay £4.99 for instant access
Was the First World War a 'Total war' for Britain?
Member rating: No Rating | Words: | Submitted: Wed Feb 11 2004
Page Preview
On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:
Was the First World War a 'Total war' for Britain? To decide whether or not the First World War was a 'Total War' we have to look at the meaning of the expression. Total War is the total engagement of a nation's economic, social, cultural, and political capital in the war. Britain did engage all sides of its capital in the war effort and was successful in its allocation of it. They had to fill posts left by men who had gone to war with women and every side of life had to relate to the campaign. In my opinion the First World War was a 'Total War' for Britain. It cost them millions of pounds, a great amount of lives were lost and wasted, and gold reserves were shattered in wartime trading. The war also changed the way in which many people lived and entitled people to many new rights,...
Get instant access
- Instant, unlimited access to our documents in full
- Swap your work for free access, or pay £4.99
- To see the full version of this document and 147,187 others
Receive email updates for this category
- Simply tell us your email address and receive a weekly Study Help Email for FREE
- Receive 3 FREE essay views with each email
- Get all the latest essays from Coursework.Info & discussion from TheStudentRoom.co.uk
