Your Status: Logged out Log in

‘Writing is often thought to be superior to speech - To what extent is this true?’  

Member rating: No Rating | Words: | Submitted: Mon Dec 22 2003

Page Preview
Preview
Previous 1 of 2 Next

On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:

'Writing is often thought to be superior to speech. To what extent is this true?' Traditionally, writing has often been considered the superior mode of communication: since the medieval age, when the majority of the populace was illiterate, the ability to write acknowledged one as a member of the upper class social elite, this association having secured writings connection with scholarship and knowledge. Certainly, there exists a myriad advantages afforded by writing. However, in more recent years the significance of speech has been increasingly recognized, partly through the development of technology such as the telephone, television and radio. This mode of communication is now rated more highly- for example, by GCSE examining boards, which now consider 'speaking and listening' to be an integral component of the English examination. Writing is not ultimately superior to speech- the two modes each have their own uses and appropriateness to different situations. In certain circumstances, writing...

To see the full version of this document, and 145,348 others

Register Now