Logged out
Access All our Essays in an Instant
Swap your work for FREE access, or pay £4.99 for instant access
According to John Searle, strong analytical devices that have Artificial Intelligence can, at most, have a strong sense of syntax and as such can interpret information by syntactic means.
Member rating: No Rating | Words: | Submitted: Mon Dec 22 2003
Page Preview
On the left is an image preview of every page of this document, and below are the first 150 words with formatting removed:
Prompt: According to John Searle, strong analytical devices that have Artificial Intelligence can, at most, have a strong sense of syntax and as such can interpret information by syntactic means. If given the opportunity, would a digital computing device (using syntactical device as a means for interpretation) be able to choose between different means of social/political/economic way of life? What means of life would the digital device choose? Give an analysis of how this decision would come about. Give John Searle's reply to these remarks. John Searle worries that the contemporary interpretation of a computing devices' "thought process" might be misconstrued as actual thought. His main focus shines on the notion of a computing device that has strong Artificial Intelligence (AI) and is capable of arriving at seeming judgments in a fashion that is in accordance with our thought process. His first three chapters of Minds, Brains, and Science is devoted...
Get instant access
- Instant, unlimited access to our documents in full
- Swap your work for free access, or pay £4.99
- To see the full version of this document and 151,736 others
